Skip to content

The AI rules that apply to you, and the systems they touch.

GhostAudit tracks 15 AI laws, executive actions and standards. Each one is checked against its official text, broken into obligations with dates, and mapped to the systems in your inventory that it affects.

The tracker's current contents. Statuses and dates are the product's reference data, last verified 10 November 2026.

Law, order or standardJurisdictionStatusNext date
EU AI ActEuropean UnionPartially applicable2 Dec 2026
Colorado ADMT ActColoradoEnacted, not yet effective1 Jan 2027
Colorado Chatbot ActColoradoEnacted, not yet effective1 Jan 2027
NYC LL 144New York CityIn forceNone scheduled
Illinois HB 3773IllinoisIn forceNone scheduled
Texas TRAIGATexasIn forceNone scheduled
California SB 53CaliforniaIn forceNone scheduled
CPPA ADMT RegulationsCaliforniaPartially applicable1 Jan 2027
Utah AI Policy ActUtahIn forceNone scheduled
NY RAISE ActNew York StateEnacted, not yet effective1 Jan 2027
EO 14365 (State AI law preemption)United States (federal)Executive action in effectNone scheduled
Federal AI bills (watch)United States (federal)Proposed, watchNone scheduled
Korea AI Basic ActSouth KoreaIn forceNone scheduled
NIST AI RMFUnited States (federal)Voluntary frameworkNone scheduled
ISO/IEC 42001GlobalVoluntary frameworkNone scheduled
01Reference data

Verified against the source, with the source linked.

AI regulation in 2026 moved faster than most summaries of it. The EU's Digital Omnibus postponed the AI Act's high-risk obligations. Colorado repealed and replaced its AI Act before it took effect. Articles written a year ago are wrong in ways that matter.

Each entry in the tracker is checked against the official publication and carries a link to it. Entries that could not be verified are left out. Proposals are labelled as proposals and never presented as law: the tracker lists pending federal bills in the United States as a watch item with no obligations.

Every regulation is split into obligation tracks, because laws rarely apply all at once. The EU AI Act has seven tracks in GhostAudit, from AI literacy (2 February 2025) to high-risk systems in regulated products (2 August 2028).

EU AI Act
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, as amended by the Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744
Partially applicable
  1. Applies now
    AI literacy measures (Art. 4)

    Take measures to support the development of AI literacy of staff and others dealing with AI systems on your behalf. Since the Omnibus (27 Jul 2026) this is a duty to take supporting measures, not to guarantee a level of literacy.

  2. Applies now
    Prohibited practices screening (Art. 5)

    Screen AI uses in sensitive contexts against the Art. 5 prohibitions (e.g. emotion recognition in the workplace, social scoring, untargeted facial-image scraping).

  3. Applies now
    General-purpose AI model provider obligations

    Technical documentation, copyright policy and training-data summary for providers of GPAI models. Deployers of third-party models are not GPAI providers.

  4. Applies now
    Transparency obligations (Art. 50)

    Disclose AI interaction to people, label deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest; providers must mark synthetic output.

  5. Upcoming
    Art. 50(2) marking grace period ends for legacy generative systems

    Providers of generative systems placed on the market before 2 Aug 2026 must implement machine-readable marking of output by 2 Dec 2026 – confirm your image/video/audio generation vendors comply. New prohibitions on AI generating non-consensual intimate imagery or CSAM also apply from this date.

  6. Upcoming
    High-risk systems – Annex III use cases

    Stand-alone high-risk uses (employment, credit, education, essential services, biometrics): provider conformity + deployer duties (human oversight, logging, monitoring, FRIA for some deployers).

  7. Upcoming
    High-risk systems – Annex I (AI in regulated products)

    AI that is a safety component of products under EU harmonisation legislation (e.g. medical devices).

As tracked in GhostAudit. Source: eur-lex.europa.eu
02Applicability

Mapped to your inventory, with the rule that matched.

A list of laws tells you little until you know which of your systems each one reaches. GhostAudit works that out from your inventory: the jurisdictions you operate in, and the attributes of each system, such as whether it is used in employment, makes consequential decisions about people, interacts with customers or generates synthetic media.

Every match shows why it matched. "Employment use" on a candidate-screening tool is a direct match. A general assistant used by people in the HR department is a potential match, shown separately until someone confirms whether it is used for hiring decisions.

You set your regulatory profile, the jurisdictions you are exposed to and whether you develop frontier or general-purpose models, and the tracker hides what does not concern you.

  • Direct and potential matches, each with its reason
  • Deadlines per obligation, in a calendar and on the dashboard
  • A regulatory profile so that out-of-scope laws stay out of the way

Example workspace. Names and figures are illustrative.

Candidate screening
Sanctioned
Vendor
HireVue
Owner
People operations · A. Moreau
Purpose
Ranks applicants for customer-support roles against the posted requirements
Affects
Job applicants in the EU, New York City and Colorado
Data
Restricted · personal data
Human oversight
Recruiter reviews every ranked list before contact
Risk tier
High
Last assessed
6 Nov 2026 · next review in 90 days
Regulations that apply, and why
  • EU AI Act · Annex III high risk · matched on employment useFrom 2 Dec 2027
  • NYC Local Law 144 · matched on employment useIn force
  • Colorado SB 26-189 · matched on consequential decisionFrom 1 Jan 2027
03Feed

New publications from official sources, classified and linked.

Alongside the curated tracker, GhostAudit pulls new publications from the Federal Register, the European Commission, the White House, NIST and GOV.UK. Each item is classified by topic and linked to the laws and the systems it relates to.

This is a feed of primary sources, so that the first thing you read about a change is the change itself. The feed is refreshed automatically every six hours. When something affects a system you own, you are notified.

Colorado ADMT Act
Colorado SB 26-189 (2026 Session Laws, ch. 131), C.R.S. §§ 6-1-1701 to 6-1-1709 – repeals and re-enacts the Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205)
Enacted, not yet effective
  1. Upcoming
    ADMT point-of-interaction notice

    Clear and conspicuous notice before covered ADMT materially influences a consequential decision; a prominent public notice at the point of interaction is sufficient.

  2. Upcoming
    Post-adverse-outcome disclosure (30 days)

    Within 30 days of an adverse outcome: plain-language description of the decision and the ADMT's role, how to request more information, and the consumer's rights.

  3. Upcoming
    Correction and meaningful human review

    On request after an adverse outcome: instructions to obtain and correct personal data, and meaningful human review and reconsideration to the extent commercially reasonable.

  4. Upcoming
    Three-year record keeping

    Keep records reasonably necessary to demonstrate compliance for at least three years after each consequential decision.

As tracked in GhostAudit. Source: leg.colorado.gov
04Limits

Orientation, with its limits stated.

The tracker covers 15 instruments today: the EU AI Act; laws and regulations in Colorado, California, New York State, New York City, Illinois, Texas and Utah; a US executive order and pending federal bills; South Korea's AI Basic Act; NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001. It is not a complete register of every AI rule in the world, and sector rules such as financial or medical regulation are outside it.

Summaries are written for orientation and are not legal advice. They are a way to arrive at the official text knowing what to look for, and to brief counsel with a specific question.

Specification

What is tracked

Reference data last verified on 10 November 2026.

EU AI Act
European Union. Partially applicable. Official source.
Colorado ADMT Act
Colorado. Enacted, not yet effective. Official source.
Colorado Chatbot Act
Colorado. Enacted, not yet effective. Official source.
NYC LL 144
New York City. In force. Official source.
Illinois HB 3773
Illinois. In force. Official source.
Texas TRAIGA
Texas. In force. Official source.
California SB 53
California. In force. Official source.
CPPA ADMT Regulations
California. Partially applicable. Official source.
Utah AI Policy Act
Utah. In force. Official source.
NY RAISE Act
New York State. Enacted, not yet effective. Official source.
EO 14365 (State AI law preemption)
United States (federal). Executive action in effect. Official source.
Federal AI bills (watch)
United States (federal). Proposed, watch. Official source.
Korea AI Basic Act
South Korea. In force. Official source.
NIST AI RMF
United States (federal). Voluntary framework. Official source.
ISO/IEC 42001
Global. Voluntary framework. Official source.
Plans
The tracker and feed are part of Govern and Enterprise. See pricing.
FAQ

Questions

How often is the tracker updated?

The curated entries are reviewed against official sources and carry a last-verified date, currently 10 November 2026. The news feed refreshes from its sources every few hours.

Is this legal advice?

No. It is a maintained summary with links to the official texts, and a mapping to your systems that shows its reasoning. Decisions about your obligations should involve your counsel.

What if a law we care about is missing?

Tell us at the contact page. We add instruments when we can verify them against an official source.

See what is in use before you decide anything.

Start a 14-day trial with every Govern feature, connect one discovery source and enroll a handful of devices. No card is needed to start, and nobody is asked to change how they work.